2020-Ģ��ƵAT-1039

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT held that the report of the JAB was not a decision resulting from a neutral first instance process and therefore could not be appealed to Ģ��ƵAT. Ģ��ƵAT held that such a case must be remanded for proper consideration by a neutral process that produces a record of the proceedings and a written decision. Ģ��ƵAT noted that the case could not be remanded to the JAB, whose functions were removed by Agreement between the Ģ��Ƶ and the WMO, signed on 20 January 2020 and effective the same date. Ģ��ƵAT remanded the case to Ģ��ƵDT for adjudication as a result of said Agreement on the extension of the jurisdiction of Ģ��ƵDT and Ģ��ƵAT to the WMO.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

WMO decision: The Applicant contested the decision of the Secretary-General of WMO to maintain the implementation of the International Civil Service Commission (ICSC) decision with respect to the Geneva post-adjustment multiplier. The matter was considered by the Joint Appeals Board (JAB) of WMO.

Legal Principle(s)

A case requires proper consideration by a neutral first instance process that includes a written record and a written decision providing reasons, fact and law in order to be appealable to Ģ��ƵAT.

Outcome

Case remanded

Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered ; No relief ordered

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Lynn

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement