2020-Ģ��ƵAT-1056

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT held that the Applicant failed to discharge his evidentiary burden to establish that his application was filed timeously. Ģ��ƵAT held that the application was 8 days late and, as such, not receivable. Ģ��ƵAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ģ��ƵRWA DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to impose a written censure and a fine equivalent to one month��s salary on him for misconduct in the form of entitlement fraud and unauthorized outside activity. Ģ��ƵRWA dismissed the application as not receivable ratione temporis.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

Outcome Extra Text

No relief was ordered.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Madhoun

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement