Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2019-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-914 from Mr Oglesby. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Mr Oglesby failed to establish the required grounds for a revision of judgment, namely the discovery of a decisive fact that was, at the time the judgment was rendered, unknown to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT and the party applying for revision. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that it had concluded in the impugned judgment that it was unable to apply the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Charter or the UDHR directly, or strike down clear Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF Regulations. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT opined that it was within the combined powers of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF, the Secretary-General and the General Assembly to right this obvious disconnection from human rights norms for Mr Oglesby and others in his situation. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT requested that both judgments be brought to the attention of the Secretary-General and the General Assembly. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the application for revision.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
In judgment No. 2019-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-914, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT affirmed the decision of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF to deny widowhood benefits to Mr Oglesby and dismissed his appeal. Under Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF Regulations, Mr Oglesby was required to be married at the time of his separation from service in order to receive those benefits; however, at the time of his separation (1998), same-sex marriage was not legal anywhere in the world and therefore he was unable to marry his partner.
Legal Principle(s)
Left deliberately blank