蘑菇视频

2021-蘑菇视频AT-1154

蘑菇视频AT Held or 蘑菇视频DT Pronouncements

The 蘑菇视频AT concluded that Mr. Russo-Got failed to show that, in deciding the merits of his claims, the 蘑菇视频DT erred in fact or in law, or that its Judgment was otherwise flawed.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

蘑菇视频DT/2020/194, in which 蘑菇视频DT rejected Mr. Russo-Got’s application challenging his non-selection for a number of positions.

Legal Principle(s)

Another request for management evaluation of the same grievance lodged by the same staff member does not stop the clock running on the calculation of the period from when the first request was made. Appointments of staff members, including by competitive selection among a group of applicants, is a matter most appropriately left to the decision of the Secretary-General’s representatives with relevant knowledge and expertise, not only in the particular field in which the recruitment is taking place, but in the field of personnel recruitment and appointment generally. The 蘑菇视频DT’s role is not to undertake a merits-based review of the decisions taken but is rather a jurisdictional and process review, or to substitute its decision about the appropriate appointee for that of the Administration’s experienced and knowledgeable experts. It is for the 蘑菇视频DT to determine its procedures, although these must conform to the principles of natural justice and, in particular, that if a party raises a new issue that the other party has not had an opportunity to address, that other party should be given an appropriate opportunity to do so.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

Appeal is dismissed and 蘑菇视频DT Judgment affirmed

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 蘑菇视频DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Marius Russo-Got
Case Number(s)
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type