蘑菇视频AT Held or 蘑菇视频DT Pronouncements
The 蘑菇视频RWA DT acknowledged that the imposed disciplinary measure of separation from service without termination indemnity is one of the most severe disciplinary measures that the Agency can impose on a staff member. Nevertheless, it decided that, given the Appellant’s misconduct in committing corporal punishment to a disabled and highly vulnerable child, and the Agency’s clear zero-tolerance policy towards corporal punishment, the disciplinary measure imposed on the Appellant appeared to be neither absurd nor arbitrary; nor was there any evidence that the measure taken had been tainted by extraneous reasons or bias.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
蘑菇视频RWA/DT/2020/052, in which 蘑菇视频RWA DT rejected Mr. Al Dirawi’s application contesting the decision to separate him from service without termination indemnity for having inflicted corporal punishment on a disabled student.
Legal Principle(s)
蘑菇视频RWA’s Staff Regulations 9.1, 10.2 and 10.3 give the Commissioner-General a wide discretion to impose disciplinary sanctions, including termination, for misconduct. ETI No. 1/08 clearly prohibits corporal punishment as misconduct that is subject to severe disciplinary measures including termination.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
Appeal dismissed; 蘑菇视频RWA DT Judgment affirmed.