2021-Ģ��ƵAT-1172

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The Appeals Tribunal found that Mr. Karkara failed to show that the Ģ��ƵDT��s assessment of the evidence had resulted in a manifestly unreasonable decision. It also found that the Ģ��ƵDT did not make any errors with regard to the admissibility of witnesses. The Ģ��ƵAT further found that the Ģ��ƵDT did not commit any procedural error, and Mr. Karkara��s allegations of procedural irregularities did not put the Ģ��ƵDT��s findings into doubt. Accordingly, the Ģ��ƵAT agreed that there was clear and convincing evidence of sexual abuse and exploitation by Mr. Karkara. The Ģ��ƵAT also held that the sanction of dismissal was appropriate given that Mr. Karkara's conduct was particularly grave in light of his work with young adults.
Accountability referral: However, the Ģ��ƵAT agreed with Mr. Karkara that the Executive Director of Ģ��Ƶ Women violated a Ģ��ƵDT Order by disclosing and discussing details of these confidential proceedings in an all-staff meeting. The Ģ��ƵAT referred the Executive Director of Ģ��Ƶ Women to the Secretary-General for a possible action to enforce accountability.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Ģ��ƵDT/2020/188

Legal Principle(s)

Under the consistent jurisprudence of the Appeals Tribunal, the assessment of evidence is foremost in the hands and responsibility of the trial judge, and the Appeals Tribunal will not lightly interfere.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Ravi Karkara

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement