2026-Ģ��ƵAT-1661

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The Ģ��ƵAT noted that in his application, the staff member had clearly identified the contested decision as the Pension Fund��s email which informed him that his pension benefits had already been paid and there were no further entitlements.

The Ģ��ƵAT noted that he had not requested a review of the decision or filed an appeal to the Standing Committee of the Pension Board but rather had filed a request for management evaluation and then appealed to the Dispute Tribunal. The Ģ��ƵAT held that, as such, he had not followed proper procedure under the rules of the Pension Fund.

The Ģ��ƵAT concluded that the Ģ��ƵDT had not erred in finding that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and dismissing the application as not receivable.

The Ģ��ƵAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ģ��ƵDT Judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

A former staff member contested a decision of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund not to pay him pension benefits.

In Order No. 126 (NBI/2025), the Ģ��ƵDT dismissed the application as not receivable.

The former staff member appealed.

Legal Principle(s)

The Dispute Tribunal does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over applications which seek to contest a Ģ��ƵJSPF determination.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Hydar Daniel Majook

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement