蘑菇视频

蘑菇视频DT/2009/031

蘑菇视频AT Held or 蘑菇视频DT Pronouncements

蘑菇视频DT noted that the Applicant had until 2 February 2009 to file an appeal before the Joint Appeals Board. However, the Applicant’s appeal was dated 27 February 2009 and was not received by the Joint Appeals Board until 3 March 2009. The Applicant’s Counsel did not present any exceptional circumstance that prevented him from filing an appeal within the time limits prescribed in the Staff Rules then in effect. 蘑菇视频DT held that the request was therefore irreceivable. 蘑菇视频DT rejected the application.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to terminate his appointment for reasons of health, pursuant to Staff Regulation 9.1.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 蘑菇视频DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Diallo
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type