Ģ��ƵDT/2010/077

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The contested decision did not affect the applicant��s terms of appointment derived from his status as a former staff member or from his status as a retiree. Furthermore, there is not a contractual relationship between the applicant and the Organization derived from his voluntary service as a member of the Panel of Counsel. The application was thus neither receivable before the Ģ��ƵAT nor before the Ģ��ƵDT. Outcome: The application was rejected.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The application deals with the decision taken by Ģ��ƵOV to restrict the applicant��s access to the Vienna International Centre (VIC) to entry for pre-arranged appointments if accompanied by the staff member with whom he had the appointment. At the time the decision was taken, the applicant was a retired Ģ��Ƶ staff member and he was member of the Panel of Counsel. In February 2007, the applicant filed an appeal before the former Ģ��ƵAT; his case was transferred to the Ģ��ƵDT in January 2010.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Sims

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement