蘑菇视频AT Held or 蘑菇视频DT Pronouncements
Receivability: Since the Applicant was a staff member of 蘑菇视频OG when the contested decision was taken, it indeed affected his terms of appointment. The Tribunal is thus competent to examine the case in accordance with article 2.1 of its Statute. Selection procedure: 蘑菇视频HCR based its decision on the advice of 蘑菇视频DSS which did not grant clearance to the Applicant’s candidacy. However, 蘑菇视频HCR was not compelled to follow the advice of 蘑菇视频DSS concerning the candidacy of the Applicant because this practice is not codified in any legal text of regulatory character. Hence, the contested decision is illegal. Compensation: In order to determine the amount of compensation to be granted, the Tribunal examined the Applicant’s chances to be retained in the roster of candidates, had no irregularity been committed. In the case at hand, it was considered that his chances were very weak. The Tribunal thus granted him an amount of CHF1,500.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant, a staff member of 蘑菇视频OG at the G-3 level, contests the decision of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees not to retain him as a candidate in the roster for Field Safety Advisor positions at the P-3 and P-4 levels.
Legal Principle(s)
N/A