蘑菇视频

蘑菇视频DT/2012/173

蘑菇视频AT Held or 蘑菇视频DT Pronouncements

The application was withdrawn by the Applicant in light of the amicable resolution of the matter.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the Administration’s decision not to take action on her request to be moved from the purview of certain staff members, following her allegations of on-going workplace harassment and abuse of authority towards her.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Closed on withdrawal

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 蘑菇视频DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Mathias
Registry
Date of Judgement
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Categories/Subcategories