Ģ��ƵDT/2012/197

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The Respondent claimed costs for unnecessary litigation. The Tribunal dismissed the Applicant��s claim in respect of the delay in submitting the PF4 form, ordered the Respondent to pay the Applicant the outstanding interest payment pursuant to Tolstopiatov Ģ��ƵDT/2011/012, and refused the Respondent��s claim for costs. Enforcement of Judgment Order: The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay interest on the money which had not been fully paid under Tolstopiatov Ģ��ƵDT/2011/012 at the rate of the US Prime Rate plus 5 percent for the relevant time period. Costs: Whilst the Tribunal would discourage unnecessary litigation, this applies to both staff members and the Administration. The Applicant was exercising his legal right and there has still only been partial satisfaction of the compensation award of Ģ��ƵDT/2011/012. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds that there was no abuse of process on the part of the Applicant.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant appealed that: (a) the Respondent ��intentionally blocked�� the submission of a Separation Notification Form, ��PF4��, to the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund for a period of 14 months; and (b) that there was a shortfall in regard to the interest payment on the award under Tolstopiatov Ģ��ƵDT/2011/012.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

Only financial compensation

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Tolstopiatov

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement