Ģ��ƵDT/2013/118

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The Applicant was not qualified to address Ģ��ƵDT because, at the time of the disputed facts, she was neither a serving nor former staff member within the meaning of Article 3.1 of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute. Ģ��ƵDT accordingly disclaimed jurisdiction in this case and dismissed the application.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to renew her service contract as well as the classification level of the position she held.

Legal Principle(s)

An applicant must be either a current or former staff member in order to bring an application before Ģ��ƵDT.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Akoa

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement