Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
The Tribunal dismissed the application as not receivable. The Tribunal found that the Applicant was a staff member of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA and contested a decision that was taken by that agency. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA did not fall under the jurisdiction of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT nor did the Applicant fulfil the requirements of arts. 2.1(a) and 3 of the Statute of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT. He therefore had no locus standi to challenge a decision of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA before the Tribunal.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA¡¯s decision to deny his request for early voluntary retirement.
Legal Principle(s)
a) The jurisdiction of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT is limited to persons having acquired the status of staff members of the United Nations or former staff members, as set out in art. 3.1 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute. b)The jurisdiction of the Tribunal is governed not only by the subject matter or nature of the litigation, which must be an administrative decision, but also on the status of the individual, that is, whether the individual is a staff member within the meaning of art. 101 of the Charter of the Organization.