Ģ��ƵDT/2019/093

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵDT held that the requirements of ST/AI/2003/3 were not satisfied since the Applicant was not serving on a higher-level post or regularly performing functions at the P-5 level. Ģ��ƵDT noted that the Applicant was serving on a post that was budgeted and classified at the P-4 level. Ģ��ƵDT further noted that there is no P-5 post within the Conference Management and Translation Unit. Ģ��ƵDT accordingly held that the Applicant did not satisfy the criteria for a Special Post Allowance. Ģ��ƵDT dismissed all claims.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to grant him a Special Post Allowance.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Mohamed

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement