Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
The evidence shows that the Applicant, on 6 June 2019, signed a contract with Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµFPA that was governed by the terms and conditions of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµFPA individual contactors. Accordingly, the Applicant, not being a staff member of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµFPA or any other entity of the United Nations, has no locus standi before this Tribunal. The present application cannot be entertained.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The decision by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµFPA to terminate the Applicant¡¯s consultancy contract.
Legal Principle(s)
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT is competent to review its own competence or jurisdiction in accordance with art. 2.6 of its Statute. This competence can be exercised even if the parties or the administrative authorities do not raise the issue, because it constitutes a matter of law and the Statute prevents the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT from receiving a case which is actually non-receivable. The jurisdiction of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT is limited only to persons who are staff members of the United Nations or who were former staff members as set out in art. 3.1 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute. To that extent, the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT jurisdiction does not apply to the hearing of applications from non-staff members.