Ģ��ƵDT/2020/035

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The application did not fall under any of the stipulated exceptions to obtaining a management evaluation as a first step to invoking the powers of the Tribunal. Thus management evaluation was a prerequisite. The application was filed out of time because it was not filed within 90 days of the Applicant��s receipt of the management evaluation response as required by art. 8.1(i)(a) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the decision to place him on an ��individual contract�� for 19 continuous months.

Legal Principle(s)

An application shall be receivable if the Applicant has previously submitted the contested administrative decision for management evaluation, where required (Ģ��ƵDT Statute, art. 8.1(c)). Staff rule 11.2(b) sets out two conditions under which an Applicant is exempted from requesting a management evaluation. It should be read together with art. 8 of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute to determine whether the application is receivable by the Ģ��ƵDT.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Adam

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement