Jurisdiction / receivability (罌厭弝ⅰDT or first instance)

2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-766, Alsado

14 Jul 2017

罌厭弝ⅰAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that the decision to terminate Mr Alsado due to abolition of post was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration＊s decision to terminate him. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 罌厭弝ⅰDT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that 罌厭弝ⅰDT made an error of law when it found Mr Alsado＊s application receivable. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that in light of the 罌厭弝ⅰDT＊s error in receiving the application, the 罌厭弝ⅰDT＊s...

2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-767, Wright

14 Jul 2017

罌厭弝ⅰAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that the decision to terminate Mr Wright＊s permanent appointment was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration＊s decision to terminate him. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 罌厭弝ⅰDT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that 罌厭弝ⅰDT made an error of law when it found Mr Wright＊s application receivable. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that in light of the 罌厭弝ⅰDT＊s error in receiving the application, the 罌厭弝ⅰDT＊s...

2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-750, Kagizi et al.

14 Jul 2017

罌厭弝ⅰAT consolidated the 51 appeals into seven groups heard by seven judicial panels, the first group (Kagizi et al. judgment No. 罌厭弝ⅰDT/2016/131) being heard by the full bench. 罌厭弝ⅰAT dismissed the appeals. 罌厭弝ⅰAT confirmed 罌厭弝ⅰDT＊s finding that the appellants lacked standing to challenge the non-renewal of their appointments in so far as they were deemed to be a direct challenge against the General Assembly＊s decision to abolish the posts. 罌厭弝ⅰAT noted that, while in other aspects, 罌厭弝ⅰDT regarded the applications as receivable and dealt with the merits of the case, those findings were not substantially...

2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-760, Sa'adeddin

14 Jul 2017

罌厭弝ⅰAT held that 罌厭弝ⅰRWA DT correctly found that the application was not receivable to the extent that it contested decisions taken. 罌厭弝ⅰAT upheld the 罌厭弝ⅰRWA DT＊s findings that the provisions in the GMIP were mandatory for the 罌厭弝ⅰRWA, that the GMIP does not include a provision with respect to retroactivity, and that 罌厭弝ⅰRWA has no discretionary authority to enrol former staff members if this is not allowed in the contract. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that the GMIP could not apply outside of its scope of application. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that there was no evidence that 罌厭弝ⅰRWA DT erred on the law or the facts, and that the Appellant＊s...

2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-756, Nkashama et al.

14 Jul 2017

罌厭弝ⅰAT held that the Appellants had raised neither factual difference nor legal issues different from those canvassed in companion cases and disposed of in judgment No. 2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-750 (Kagizi et al. ) and therefore 罌厭弝ⅰAT adopted the reasoning from its prior judgment at paragraphs 18-27. 罌厭弝ⅰAT dismissed the appeals and affirmed the 罌厭弝ⅰDT judgments.

2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-761, Michaud

14 Jul 2017

As a preliminary matter, 罌厭弝ⅰAT denied the Appellant＊s motion to adduce additional evidence in the form of an affidavit by him for the absence of exceptional circumstances. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that the Office of Audit and Investigation Services (OAIS) took no decision that materially, adversely, or directly impacted the rights of the Appellant and that it merely made a non-binding recommendation to 罌厭弝ⅰDP. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that the recommendation by OAIS was not an administrative decision. 罌厭弝ⅰAT held that 罌厭弝ⅰDT was correct to hold that the appeal in relation to the investigation was not receivable ratione materiae...

2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-755, Ramazani et al.

14 Jul 2017

2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-754, Kisubi et al.

14 Jul 2017

2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-751, Wanza et al.

14 Jul 2017

罌厭弝ⅰAT held that the Appellants had raised neither factual differences nor legal issues different from those canvassed in companion cases and disposed of in judgment No. 2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-750 (Kagizi et al.). 罌厭弝ⅰAT, therefore, adopted the reasoning from its prior judgment in paragraphs 18-27. 罌厭弝ⅰAT dismissed the appeals and affirmed the 罌厭弝ⅰDT judgments.

2017-罌厭弝ⅰAT-753, Kiluwe et al.

14 Jul 2017