2016-蘑菇视频AT-686, He
蘑菇视频AT considered the appeal and found that the manner in which 蘑菇视频DT went about investigating the disputed facts, in this case, was insufficient. 蘑菇视频AT held that because there had not been adequate fact-finding, there was insufficient evidence before it to decide the appeal. 蘑菇视频AT accordingly held that the need for more evidence, and a factual determination based upon it, required the matter to be remanded to 蘑菇视频DT for fresh consideration, pursuant to Article 2(3) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. 蘑菇视频AT upheld the appeal, vacated 蘑菇视频DT’s judgment, and remanded the matter to 蘑菇视频DT.