蘑菇视频

Right to a hearing

  • Access to justice
  • Delay
  • Investigation
  • Right to a hearing
  • Right to appeal
  • Right to comment/respond
  • Right to confront complainant
    • Showing 11 - 12 of 12
    2019-蘑菇视频AT-918, Nadasan

    On the delay before 蘑菇视频DT, 蘑菇视频AT agreed that the delay was unfort蘑菇视频ATe but held that the Applicant had not demonstrated that it was a procedural error affecting the outcome of the case. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT erred in exercising its case management discretion when it refused the request for an oral hearing, but that this error did not affect the decision of the case. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT did not err as there was clear and convincing evidence that the Applicant had committed sexual harassment. 蘑菇视频AT held that the disciplinary sanction of separation from service with compensation in lieu of notice and...

    蘑菇视频DT/2014/015, Nzokirishaka

    The Tribunal concluded that the facts on which the sanction was based were established, that the established facts constituted misconduct and that the sanction was proportionate to the offence. Hearings in disciplinary matters: The Tribunal held that it is the duty of the Judge to decide whether the nature of the case is such that a hearing may be dispensed with. The Judge should consider the following factors: (i) the issues raised and their complexity; (ii) the availability and relevance of witnesses; (iii) the stand of the Applicant and that of Respondent; and (iv) the legal issues involved...