2010-蘑菇视频AT-057, Fagundes
蘑菇视频AT noted that when the new system was created, 蘑菇视频DT was not given powers to hear a matter already finally decided by the former Administrative Tribunal. 蘑菇视频AT accordingly held that 蘑菇视频DT was correct in finding that it did not have the power to review the decision of the former Administrative Tribunal. 蘑菇视频AT further held that the Appellant exhausted her avenues of appeal and that 蘑菇视频DT correctly found that it had no jurisdiction to hear another appeal. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频DT judgment.
2010-蘑菇视频AT-050/Corr.1, Nasr Ishak
In Judgment No. 2010-蘑菇视频AT-050, 蘑菇视频AT held that the appeal was time-barred and not receivable since it was not filed within 45 calendar days of receipt of the 蘑菇视频DT Judgment. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT had correctly concluded that it had no jurisdiction to receive the Appellant’s appeal before the JAB. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频DT Judgment. In Judgment No. 2010-蘑菇视频AT-050/Corr.1, 蘑菇视频AT noted that the Appellant was granted an extension of time to file an appeal to 16 February 2010 and he filed his appeal on that date. 蘑菇视频AT rejected the Secretary-General’s submission that the appeal was...
2010-蘑菇视频AT-041, Balestrieri
蘑菇视频AT held that her appointment was terminated due to a lack of funding; several of her colleagues also had their fixed-term appointments terminated for the same reason at the same time. 蘑菇视频AT held that the fact that the Appellant may have complained about her working conditions or cooperated in any subsequent preliminary investigation into possible harassment, did not on its face exposes her to the termination. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was no reversible error on part of 蘑菇视频DT. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频DT judgment.
2010-蘑菇视频AT-020, Adwan
In considering the appeal brought forth by the Appellant, 蘑菇视频AT preliminarily held that the 蘑菇视频RWA JAB erred in finding that the appeal was not receivable due to late filing; 蘑菇视频AT held that it was evident the JAB appeal was filed on time. With regard to the substance of the appeal, 蘑菇视频AT held that it was within 蘑菇视频RWA’s power and discretion to refuse the Appellant’s reinstatement since it had already filled his position. 蘑菇视频AT affirmed 蘑菇视频RWA’s position that there was no error in refusing the Appellant’s reinstatement and dismissed the appeal.
2010-蘑菇视频AT-019, Carranza
蘑菇视频AT confirmed the 蘑菇视频JSPB’s interpretation of Article 24 of the Regulations to the effect that the 2007 amendment to Article 24 of the 蘑菇视频JSPF Regulations only applies to staff members who prior to 2007 had been ineligible to restore previous contributory service. 蘑菇视频AT held, therefore, that the amended Article 24 did not apply to the staff member as he had been eligible to restore previous contributory service but had failed to do so in a timely manner.
2010-蘑菇视频AT-015, Macharia
蘑菇视频AT considered the Appellant’s appeal and found that she did not demonstrate that her request for an extension of time was reasonable. 蘑菇视频AT found that the evidence about negotiations being contemplated, needed, or underway was previously refuted on appeal. 蘑菇视频AT noted that the Appellant had the time and the assistance of legal counsel to advance her application and did not avail herself of those opportunities. 蘑菇视频AT accordingly dismissed the appeal.
2010-蘑菇视频AT-009, James
蘑菇视频AT considered Mr James’ appeal and the Secretary-General’s cross-appeal. 蘑菇视频AT affirmed 蘑菇视频DT’s finding that Mr James was not eligible for the P-3 position both because he did not take the required examination and because of the lack of required qualifications. 蘑菇视频AT accordingly dismissed Mr James’ appeal that 蘑菇视频DT erred in not awarding him compensation for loss of opportunity. 蘑菇视频AT allowed the cross-appeal and set aside the order for compensation for distress. 蘑菇视频AT noted that the compensation was not requested, there was no evidence of damage or injuries, and Mr James acknowledged on appeal...
2010-蘑菇视频AT-001, Campos
蘑菇视频AT affirmed the 蘑菇视频DT findings that there was no flaw in the procedure used by the Staff Management Coordinating Committee to select the staff representative on the IJC. 蘑菇视频AT also affirmed the 蘑菇视频DT judgments rejecting the staff member’s allegations of conflict of interest on the part of the 蘑菇视频DT judges. 蘑菇视频AT further rejected the staff member’s request that 蘑菇视频AT judges recuse themselves from the hearing of the appeal, noting the limited role of the IJC in the appointment of the 蘑菇视频AT judges and the lack of any professional relationship between the person appointed as a staff representative and...