2013-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-357, Baig et al.
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the ASG/OHRM, and not the ICTY Registrar, had discretionary authority in matters of permanent appointment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the ASG/OHRM had failed to exercise her discretion in a lawful manner in adopting a blanket policy of denial of permanent appointments to ICTY staff members rather than affording them the individual consideration to which they were entitled. Finding that the staff members were discriminated against and the impugned decision was legally void, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT rescinded the impugned decisions and remanded the matter to the ASG/OHRM for consideration of retroactive...