蘑菇视频

PD A/60

  • Area Staff Personnel Directive No. A/4/Part II, Rev. 8/Section I
  • IPD 1/10
  • IPD/I/104.4
  • IPD/I/112.6/Rev.1
  • PD 1/4/Part I/Rev.1
  • PD A/10
  • PD A/10/Rev.1
  • PD A/10/Rev.3
  • PD A/17
  • PD A/2/Part.II/Rev. 4
  • PD A/23
  • PD A/3
  • PD A/4/Part II/Rev.7
  • PD A/4/Part VII/Rev.7
  • PD A/5/Part II
  • PD A/5/Rev.7/Part II
  • PD A/6/Amend.12/Part III
  • PD A/6/Amend.72
  • PD A/6/Part II/Amend.2
  • PD A/6/Part VI
  • PD A/60
  • PD A/9
  • PD A/9/Rev.10
  • PD I/104.2
  • PD No.A/3/Rev.1/Part XI/Amend.5
  • PD/A/1/Rev.1/Par1/Section 1
  • PD/A/4/Part II/ Rev.7/Section 1
    • Showing 1 - 1 of 1
    2022-蘑菇视频AT-1194, Jafar Hilmi Wakid

    蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT did not commit an error in procedure, such as to affect the decision of the case pursuant to Article 2(1) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. 蘑菇视频AT rejected the argument that the fact that the Appellant did not receive the recordings of the hearing or transcript affected the decision of the case. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant merely repeated arguments raised before 蘑菇视频RWA DT. 蘑菇视频AT accepted 蘑菇视频RWA DT’s finding that the Appellant had ample opportunity to respond to allegations and provide comments on the investigation report and exhibits. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT made fundamental errors of...