2019-蘑菇视频AT-976, Ganbold
蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT had committed various errors of law, fact, and procedure. 蘑菇视频AT held that the whole reasoning of 蘑菇视频DT was misconstrued and 蘑菇视频DT did not properly examine the lawfulness of the disciplinary sanction. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant awarded and signed a contract on behalf of 蘑菇视频FPA, that she did not conduct any market research or consider other suppliers before doing so, that she had no authority to sign the contract and that she was involved in procurement activities in relation to another 蘑菇视频FPA vendor. Further, 蘑菇视频AT held that there was...