2010-Ģ��ƵAT-022

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT noted that, when reviewing a sanction imposed by the Administration, it needed to examine whether the facts on which the sanction was based were established; whether the established facts legally amounted to misconduct; and whether the disciplinary measure applied was disproportionate to the offense. Ģ��ƵAT affirmed the Commissioner-General��s decision to discipline the staff member for misconduct. However, in light of the mitigating factors, Ģ��ƵAT held that the disciplinary measure was disproportionate to the offense and substituted the disciplinary measure of demotion with that of a written censure.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Ģ��ƵRWA decision: The staff member was demoted from grade 12 to grade 10 with loss of salary, for misconduct. He appealed the demotion decision to the former JAB which found that there was ��sufficient and cogent evidence�� to support the decision to demote him. The Commissioner-General approved the former JAB��s findings.

Legal Principle(s)

When reviewing a sanction imposed by the Administration, Ģ��ƵDT and Ģ��ƵAT need to examine whether the facts on which the sanction is based are established; whether the established facts legally amount to misconduct; and whether the disciplinary measure applied is disproportionate to the offense.

Outcome

Appeal granted in part

Outcome Extra Text

Only specific performance

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Abu Hamda

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement