Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the repeated requests by the Appellant to the management over a period of seven years for a correction of his entry-level were mere restatements of the original claim and did not stop the deadline for contesting the decision from running. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT did not have the power to waive or suspend the deadline for requesting administrative review under the old internal justice system (Costa (2010-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-036)). Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT erred in law in applying the decision in Rosca (Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT/2009/052), which was disproved by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT in Costa, but that the error did not affect the outcome for the case. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the application was time-barred and not receivable. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the level at which he was appointed upon joining the Organisation. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT dismissed the application as non-receivable as it was time-barred.
Legal Principle(s)
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT does not have the power to waive or suspend the deadline for requesting administrative review.