Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2011-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-101

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT had before it: an application for interpretation of judgment No. 2010-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-043 on the issue of to which Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Registry Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT remanded Ms Mezoui¡¯s case; two appeals from Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Order Nos. 71 (GVA/2010) and 73 (GVA/2010); and a motion for joinder and fast-track hearing. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the application for interpretation was a ruse to have Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT interfere with Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT¡¯s assignment of venue. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that venue was a matter for the trial court¡¯s discretion, with which it would not interfere. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that it would not, generally, entertain interlocutory appeals. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT denied the application for interpretation as unnecessary and interlocutory. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT denied the motion for joinder of interlocutory appeals and their fast-track hearing as interlocutory and moot. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT denied all of Ms Mezoui¡¯s interlocutory appeals.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Previous Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT judgment and Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT orders: Ms Mezoui contested a determination by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT that her case was not receivable. In Judgment No. 2010-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-043, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT remanded the case to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT for a hearing on the merits. In Order No. 71 (GVA/2010), Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT ordered, inter alia, that the case be reopened, that a copy of a memorandum be transmitted to Ms Mezoui and that she must file a complete application to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT in Geneva by a certain date. In Order No. 73 (GVA/2010), Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT rejected her motion for a change of venue.

Legal Principle(s)

Generally, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT will not entertain interlocutory appeals.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Mezoui
Entity
Case Number(s)
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type