2011-Ģ��ƵAT-133

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT considered judgment Nos. Ģ��ƵDT/2009/052 and Ģ��ƵDT/2009/062. Ģ��ƵAT held that the appeal to the Joint Appeals Board was not filed within the time limits and that Ģ��ƵDT did not have jurisdiction to waive them. Ģ��ƵAT held that the application before Ģ��ƵDT was not receivable ratione temporis. Ģ��ƵAT dismissed the appeal and vacated the Ģ��ƵDT judgments.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to reassign him and to extend his appointment. Ģ��ƵDT dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

Ģ��ƵDT does not have jurisdiction to waive time limits for management evaluation or administrative review.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Rosca

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement