Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that, since the Appellant was not a staff member of IOM at the time of the Agreement between the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF and IOM of 6 March 2006, the terms of the Agreement were not applicable to him as, by its terms, the Agreement only covered staff members who were current at the time of the Agreement. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the different treatment of IOM staff members was created by the General Assembly. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that restoration is an exceptional benefit that cannot be extended by analogy. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant¡¯s claim of inconsistency, unequal treatment, and arbitrariness by the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPB was unfounded. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed his claim for compensation. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the decision of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPB.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to consider his previous work with the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) as contributory service.
Legal Principle(s)
Only the General Assembly can amend the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµJSPF Regulations. Restoration is an exceptional benefit and cannot be extended by analogy.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
No relief ordered; No relief ordered.