蘑菇视频

Article 1

  • Annex I
  • Annex IV
  • Annex ll
  • Article 1
  • Article 1(l)
  • Article 1(q)
  • Article 1(v)
  • Article 10
  • Article 13
  • Article 2
  • Article 22
  • Article 22(b)
  • Article 22(c)
  • Article 24
  • Article 24(a)
  • Article 25
  • Article 25(b)(i)
  • Article 27
  • Article 28
  • Article 28(d)
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(e)
  • Article 30
  • Article 30(b)
  • Article 31
  • Article 31 (b) (ii)
  • Article 31(a)
  • Article 31(b)(i)
  • Article 32
  • Article 32(a)
  • Article 32(b)
  • Article 33
  • Article 33(a)
  • Article 34
  • Article 35
  • Article 35(b)(i)
  • Article 35ter
  • Article 38
  • Article 4(b)
  • Article 4(c)
  • Article 40
  • Article 44
  • Article 45
  • Article 48
  • Article 48(a)
  • Article 49(b)
  • Article 50
  • Article 50(b)
  • Article 53
  • Article 54
  • Article 6
  • Article 6(a)
  • Former Regulation 31
  • Former Regulation 35
  • Regulation 1(n)
  • Regulation 30(a)
  • Section H.5
  • Section K
  • Section K.1
  • Section K.5
  • Section K.8(a)
  • Section K.8(b)
    • Showing 1 - 2 of 2
    2010-蘑菇视频AT-034, Muthuswami et al.

    蘑菇视频AT noted that the Appellants did not refer to any article of the Regulations that provides that the full retirement benefit may be restored after a participant opts to commute a portion of the retirement benefit into a lump sum. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellants were bound by their decision to accept one-third of their pension as a lump sum and a reduced pension. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant’s decision could not simply be reversed. 蘑菇视频AT rejected the argument that the Appellants had been discriminated against and that their basic fundamental rights concerning equity, fairness, and justice under...

    2011-蘑菇视频AT-136, Ardisson

    蘑菇视频AT held that, since the Appellant was not a staff member of IOM at the time of the Agreement between the 蘑菇视频JSPF and IOM of 6 March 2006, the terms of the Agreement were not applicable to him as, by its terms, the Agreement only covered staff members who were current at the time of the Agreement. 蘑菇视频AT held that the different treatment of IOM staff members was created by the General Assembly. 蘑菇视频AT noted that restoration is an exceptional benefit that cannot be extended by analogy. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant’s claim of inconsistency, unequal treatment, and arbitrariness by the 蘑菇视频JSPB was...