Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an application for revision of both judgment No. 2010-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-098 (underlying judgment) and judgment No. 2011-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-163 (judgment on application for revision). Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the application for revision of the underlying judgment was not receivable, as it was time-barred for not having been made within one year of the underlying judgment. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute and its Rules of Procedure did not provide for the revision of a judgment on revision and that to allow such an application would defeat the purpose of the one-year time limit. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the application for revision of the judgment on application for revision was not receivable. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the application.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Previous Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT judgment: In judgment No. 2010-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-098, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT reversed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment and affirmed the impugned decision to summarily dismiss Mr Masri. In judgment No. 2011-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-163, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT rejected an application for revision of judgment No. 2010-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-098.
Legal Principle(s)
The underlying rationale for the provisions relating to an application for revision of judgment is the finality of judgments.