Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT preliminarily rejected the request for an oral hearing finding no need for further clarification of the issues arising from the appeal. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT had correctly concluded that the Appellant failed to identify an administrative decision, having a direct and adverse impact on his contractual rights, capable of being reviewed. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant was not challenging a specific administrative but had asked Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT to overturn a policy. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment: The Applicant challenged the Organisation¡¯s inaction in addressing his complaint of discrimination against men in the Organisation¡¯s hiring process in general and rostering process. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT held that the contested decision was not an administrative decision over which Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT had jurisdiction. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT dismissed the application as not receivable ratione materiae.
Legal Principle(s)
An Applicant must identify an administrative decision capable of being reviewed and that has a direct and adverse impact on his contractual rights.