Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered the Appellant¡¯s submission that she let the deadline elapse primarily because she was confused by the first sentence of the message she received from the Office of the Deputy High Commissioner. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT noted that this circumstance was previously considered by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT was satisfied that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT¡¯s pronouncement was in accordance with the established case law. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT rejected the appeal.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested a decision not to promote her and the lack of reply to her management evaluation request. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT rejected her application as time-barred and did not find any evidence of exceptional circumstances to warrant a waiver or extension of the applicable time limits in her case.
Legal Principle(s)
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT strictly enforces various time limits. Only circumstances beyond an applicant¡¯s control that prevented the applicant from exercising the right of appeal in a timely manner may be considered ¡°exceptional circumstances,¡± justifying a waiver of the statutory time limit.