2015-Ģ��ƵAT-495

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT held that the Appellant did not indicate any errors on the part of Ģ��ƵRWA DT that would require a reversal of its judgment. Ģ��ƵAT held that there was no error in Ģ��ƵRWA DT��s finding. Ģ��ƵAT held that the Appellant did not comply with the filing deadlines. Ģ��ƵAT held that Ģ��ƵRWA DT did not commit any error when it determined that the application before it was not receivable as it was time-barred. Ģ��ƵAT dismissed the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to provide her with financial assistance after she developed a health condition due to the spraying of insecticide while at work. Ģ��ƵRWA DT dismissed the application as not receivable.

Legal Principle(s)

Time limits will be strictly enforced by Ģ��ƵAT.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Diab

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement