Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant raised the same issues he raised before Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT and did not identify how the judgment was in any way defective. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant did not identify any of the required grounds of appeal and failed to demonstrate that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT committed any error of fact or law in arriving at its decision. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant¡¯s case was fully and fairly considered by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT and found no error of law or fact in its decision. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant, an Assistant Head Teacher, contested his transfer to another school. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA DT issued a summary judgment rejecting the application as time-barred and non-receivable ratione temporis.
Legal Principle(s)
The appeals procedure is of a corrective nature and is not an opportunity for a dissatisfied party to reargue his or her case. A party must demonstrate that the court below committed an error of fact or law warranting intervention by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
No relief ordered; No relief ordered