Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered two appeals by the Secretary-General against Order No. 136 (NBI/2010) and judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT/2014/007. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that it was not satisfied that the actions of the Secretary-General in filing two appeals amounted to an abuse of process and declined Ms Fiala¡¯s application for an award of costs against the Secretary-General. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that there was no error of law or fact on the part of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT in deeming Ms Fiala¡¯s application receivable. Noting that the weight to be attributed to evidence was a matter for Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the arguments advanced by the Secretary-General did not persuade it that the conclusions of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT were manifestly unreasonable in all the circumstances of the case. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found no merit in the Secretary-General¡¯s challenge to the award of moral damages. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed both appeals, affirmed Order No. 136 (NBI/2010) and judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT/2014/007 and instructed the Registrar to close Case No. 2014-590.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Ms Fiala contested the decision to appoint her at the FS-4 level rather than the FS-5 Level. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT found for Ms Fiala, awarding compensation and moral damages.
Legal Principle(s)
Where Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT renders separate judgments on receivability and on the merits, an appeal should be filed only after the final judgment has been rendered. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT cannot try a case de novo; it defers to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT on factual matters, especially when oral testimony is taken. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT is best placed to assess damages.