Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2015-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-516

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered two appeals by the Secretary-General against Order No. 136 (NBI/2010) and judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT/2014/007. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that it was not satisfied that the actions of the Secretary-General in filing two appeals amounted to an abuse of process and declined Ms Fiala¡¯s application for an award of costs against the Secretary-General. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that there was no error of law or fact on the part of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT in deeming Ms Fiala¡¯s application receivable. Noting that the weight to be attributed to evidence was a matter for Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the arguments advanced by the Secretary-General did not persuade it that the conclusions of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT were manifestly unreasonable in all the circumstances of the case. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT found no merit in the Secretary-General¡¯s challenge to the award of moral damages. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed both appeals, affirmed Order No. 136 (NBI/2010) and judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT/2014/007 and instructed the Registrar to close Case No. 2014-590.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Ms Fiala contested the decision to appoint her at the FS-4 level rather than the FS-5 Level. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT found for Ms Fiala, awarding compensation and moral damages.

Legal Principle(s)

Where Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT renders separate judgments on receivability and on the merits, an appeal should be filed only after the final judgment has been rendered. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT cannot try a case de novo; it defers to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT on factual matters, especially when oral testimony is taken. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT is best placed to assess damages.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.