2020-Ģ��ƵAT-999

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Ģ��ƵAT considered an application for correction of judgment for judgment No. 2019-Ģ��ƵAT-940 filed by Mr Wilson in order to reflect a correction of dates that Ģ��ƵDT had made to its own judgment. Ģ��ƵAT held that it was necessary to correct the date of the receipt of a Management Evaluation Unit response, a crucial factor for calculating time limits under the Ģ��ƵDT Statute, as, without the correction, the Appellant��s application to Ģ��ƵDT would have been not receivable ratione temporis. Ģ��ƵAT granted the Appellant��s application and ordered the correction of the Ģ��ƵAT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Mr Wilson contested his non-selection for a position. In judgment No. Ģ��ƵDT/2018/136, Ģ��ƵDT found for Mr Wilson. However, in judgment No. 2019-Ģ��ƵAT-940, Ģ��ƵAT vacated the Ģ��ƵDT judgment and remanded the case back to Ģ��ƵDT for reconsideration.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Wilson

Entity

Case Number(s)

2019-1312

Tribunal

Ģ��ƵAT

Registry

New York

Date of Judgement

27 Mar 2020