Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT Pronouncements
The Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT held that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT did not commit any error in procedure that affected the outcome of the case by partially denying the former staff member¡¯s motions for production of additional evidence or by not granting him sufficient additional time to respond to the Secretary-General¡¯s submissions.
The Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT also concluded that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT appropriately identified the contested decision as the 1 April 2022 decision finding him ineligible to participate in ASHI. The Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT observed that the former staff member himself identified this decision in both his Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT application and his management evaluation request.
The former staff member was recruited and given a fixed-term appointment with Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵICEF from 2016 until 2020. Prior to this, he served with the World Health Organization (WHO) from 1997 to 2005 in consultancy and short-term appointments. However, the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT held that this period of service with WHO could not be considered as continuous and counted towards the 10 years of contributory health insurance plan requirement, as it did not meet the qualifications for reinstatement outlined in Staff Rule 4.18. Therefore, the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT determined that he could only be eligible to enroll in the ASHI programme if he had participated in a contributory health insurance plan of the United Nations for a minimum of 10 years. Since he only participated in such a plan, in a fixed-term capacity, from 2016 until 2020, the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT concluded that he was not eligible to enroll in ASHI.
The Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed Judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT/2023/051.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
A former staff member of the United Nations Children¡¯s Fund (Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵICEF) contested the decision to find him ineligible to participate in the Organization¡¯s after-service health insurance plan (ASHI).
In its Judgment No. Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT/2023/051, the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT dismissed his application, concluding that the contested decision was lawful as he had not accumulated the required 10 years of contributory participation in a United Nations health insurance plan.
Former staff member appealed.
Legal Principle(s)
The Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵAT will not interfere lightly with the broad discretion of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT in its case management. Additionally, the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT does not have to address each and every claim made by a litigant, particularly when a claim lacks merit.
The Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT has the authority to individualize and define the contested administrative decision and identify what is in fact being contested and subject to judicial review. A management evaluation response is considered a decision or action of a complementary nature to the administrative decision.
A party, in order to be successful on appeal, not only has to assert and show that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵDT committed an error in procedure but also that this error affected the decision on the case.
The eligibility to participate in ASHI for a staff member recruited on or after 1 July 2007 is contingent on meeting the criteria outlined in Section 2.1(a)(ii) of ST/AI/2007/3, which requires having been a participant in a contributory health insurance plan of the United Nations for a minimum of ten years. Moreover, a staff member who is re-employed is treated as having a new appointment without regard to any period of former service.