2024-Ģ��ƵAT-1503

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The Ģ��ƵAT held that the Ģ��ƵRWA DT had appropriately concluded that Mr. Issa failed to submit a timely Request for Decision Review regarding the first of three months�� non-payment of his salary. However, the Ģ��ƵAT held that, since each non-payment constitutes a separate administrative decision, Mr. Issa's Request for Decision Review regarding the second- and third-months�� non-payment was timely, rendering his application partially receivable.

The Ģ��ƵAT further concluded however, that since Mr. Issa disregarded a directive circulated before his annual leave (when he was able to check his e-mail) asking him to report his intention to strike or not, and at no point between then and the end of the strike did he in fact report to work as he was permitted to do, there was no merit in his claim for restoration of his pay during the months in which he did not work.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

A staff member contested the decisions to place him on strike leave and withhold his salaries and related entitlements for three months.

In Judgment Ģ��ƵRWA/DT/2023/041, the Ģ��ƵRWA DT found that Mr. Issa��s application was not receivable ratione materiae, as Mr. Issa failed to submit a Request for Decision Review on time.

Mr. Issa appealed.

Legal Principle(s)

Each non-payment to a staff member of every month constitutes a distinct administrative decision subject to review.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

Judgment No. Ģ��ƵRWA/DT/2023/041 is affirmed for different reasons.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Amjad Issa

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement