Ģ��ƵDT/2011/168

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The Ģ��ƵDT found that General Assembly resolution 63/253, by which the Assembly adopted the statutes of the Ģ��ƵDT and the Ģ��ƵAT, imposed limitations on their jurisdiction. Interns presently do not have access to the Ģ��ƵDT and the Ģ��ƵAT. Having found that it does not have jurisdiction to consider the application, the Ģ��ƵDT dismissed it without consideration of its merits.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a former intern at the United Nations Secretariat, filed an application contesting two decisions: (i) the decision not to pursue a disciplinary case against him, and (ii) the decision to require him to be accompanied by a security escort when accessing the United Nations premises in New York.

Legal Principle(s)

Interns, jurisdiction of the Ģ��ƵDT: Interns presently do not have access to the Ģ��ƵDT and the Ģ��ƵAT. By way of an obiter, the Ģ��ƵDT included observations regarding the legal status of interns and access to justice, concluding that proper attention should be given to ensuring that interns have access to an appropriate dispute resolution mechanism.Right to an effective remedy: Where rights and obligations attach, there must be an effective mechanism for resolution of disputes and for reparation of breached rights through appropriate remedies.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Di Giacomo

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement