Ģ��ƵDT/2012/202

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

The Dispute Tribunal shall not award exemplary or punitive damages. The Tribunal did not find any procedural flaws in the competitive review process as it was implemented in the Applicant��s case. All three candidates for the PIO posts were assessed against the same methodology and criteria adopted by the CRP. The Applicant was not accorded full and fair consideration for the second P-3 PIO post in Ģ��ƵMISS contrary to the policy adopted by the CRP. In this regard, there were both substantive and procedural irregularities on the part of the Respondent.The Applicant is entitled to compensation for the substantive and procedural irregularities occasioned to him by the failure by the Administration to follow its own procedures.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

On 30 December 2011, the Applicant filed an Application contesting the termination of his fixed-term appointment with the United Nations Mission in Sudan (��Ģ��ƵMIS��) upon the closure of Ģ��ƵMIS and upon its transitioning to the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (��Ģ��ƵMISS��). The Applicant alleged that there were other P3 PIO posts in Ģ��ƵMISS and that he was not accorded full and fair consideration for these. He also alleged that there were procedural irregularities in this regard.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

Outcome Extra Text

Ģ��ƵDT ordered the Respondent to pay the Applicant 16 months' net base salary in financial compensation.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Dakamseh

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement