Ģ��ƵDT/2014/083

Ģ��ƵAT Held or Ģ��ƵDT Pronouncements

Administrative decision: The Tribunal held that although Ģ��ƵIFEM/Ģ��ƵDP subsequently took a decision to process the Applicant��s separation from service in 2012, the Tribunal concluded that this was not an appealable administrative decision in accordance with article 2.1 of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute in that the Applicant no longer had a contract of employment with the Organization because he resigned from service in May 2008. Thus, Ģ��ƵIFEM��s 2012 decision to finally record his separation from service did not have any direct legal consequences on him. ;}

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged a ��termination process in August 2012�� that was initiated by Ģ��ƵDP.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ģ��ƵDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ģ��ƵAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Weeks

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement