蘑菇视频

Article 38

  • Annex I
  • Annex IV
  • Annex ll
  • Article 1
  • Article 1(l)
  • Article 1(q)
  • Article 1(v)
  • Article 10
  • Article 13
  • Article 2
  • Article 22
  • Article 22(b)
  • Article 22(c)
  • Article 24
  • Article 24(a)
  • Article 25
  • Article 25(b)(i)
  • Article 27
  • Article 28
  • Article 28(d)
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(e)
  • Article 30
  • Article 30(b)
  • Article 31
  • Article 31 (b) (ii)
  • Article 31(a)
  • Article 31(b)(i)
  • Article 32
  • Article 32(a)
  • Article 32(b)
  • Article 33
  • Article 33(a)
  • Article 34
  • Article 35
  • Article 35(b)(i)
  • Article 35ter
  • Article 38
  • Article 4(b)
  • Article 4(c)
  • Article 40
  • Article 44
  • Article 45
  • Article 48
  • Article 48(a)
  • Article 49(b)
  • Article 50
  • Article 50(b)
  • Article 53
  • Article 54
  • Article 6
  • Article 6(a)
  • Former Regulation 31
  • Former Regulation 35
  • Regulation 1(n)
  • Regulation 30(a)
  • Section H.5
  • Section K
  • Section K.1
  • Section K.5
  • Section K.8(a)
  • Section K.8(b)
    • Showing 1 - 2 of 2
    2025-蘑菇视频AT-1534-Corr.1, Dionette Pino Genayas

    The 蘑菇视频AT noted that months after the death of the participant in the Fund, the Appellant had produced Pens.A/2 forms purporting to change the designation of the beneficiary of the residual settlement, executed by a thumbprint and not the participant’s signature. The 蘑菇视频AT also noted the medical evidence of signs of the participant’s dementia.

    The 蘑菇视频AT found that the Appellant had provided no evidence to support the contention that the participant’s mental capacity had improved by the time of thumbprinting the later forms. The 蘑菇视频AT held that the Fund had not erred when it found those forms...

    2017-蘑菇视频AT-736, Williams

    蘑菇视频AT held that the Applicant was not entitled to a widow’s benefit under Article 34 of the 蘑菇视频JPSF Regulations as she married Mr Williams, her deceased husband, after his separation from service. 蘑菇视频AT noted that, under Article 35ter of the 蘑菇视频JSPF Regulations, the survivor’s benefit had to be purchased by a retiree who marries after separation from service as an annuity within a prescribed one-year deadline after the date of the marriage. 蘑菇视频AT noted that Mr Williams had elected not to do so. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was no obligation for 蘑菇视频JSPF to inform Mr Williams of the option. 蘑菇视频AT held that...