蘑菇视频

Article 44

  • Annex I
  • Annex IV
  • Annex ll
  • Article 1
  • Article 1(l)
  • Article 1(q)
  • Article 1(v)
  • Article 10
  • Article 13
  • Article 2
  • Article 22
  • Article 22(b)
  • Article 22(c)
  • Article 24
  • Article 24(a)
  • Article 25
  • Article 25(b)(i)
  • Article 27
  • Article 28
  • Article 28(d)
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(e)
  • Article 30
  • Article 30(b)
  • Article 31
  • Article 31 (b) (ii)
  • Article 31(a)
  • Article 31(b)(i)
  • Article 32
  • Article 32(a)
  • Article 32(b)
  • Article 33
  • Article 33(a)
  • Article 34
  • Article 35
  • Article 35(b)(i)
  • Article 35ter
  • Article 38
  • Article 4(b)
  • Article 4(c)
  • Article 40
  • Article 44
  • Article 45
  • Article 48
  • Article 48(a)
  • Article 49(b)
  • Article 50
  • Article 50(b)
  • Article 53
  • Article 54
  • Article 6
  • Article 6(a)
  • Former Regulation 31
  • Former Regulation 35
  • Regulation 1(n)
  • Regulation 30(a)
  • Section H.5
  • Section K
  • Section K.1
  • Section K.5
  • Section K.8(a)
  • Section K.8(b)
    • Showing 1 - 2 of 2
    2025-蘑菇视频AT-1573, Ghislain Robyn

    The 蘑菇视频AT held that the Fund reasonably chose a 30-year timeframe for its statistical analysis to determine whether there were “aberrant results” in terms of pensions received by beneficiaries who had chosen Slovakia as their country of residence. Similarly, the 蘑菇视频AT held that the conclusions drawn by the Fund from the analysis were properly reached, highlighting that the graph showed a wide disparity between resident beneficiaries who separated from 1993 to 2007 and those who separated afterwards, a disparity solely due to differences in separation dates.

    The 蘑菇视频AT found that the suspension...

    2020-蘑菇视频AT-997, Clemente

    蘑菇视频AT considered an application by 蘑菇视频JSPB for interpretation of judgment No. 2019-蘑菇视频AT-912 related to the calculation and payment of interest. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was nothing unclear or ambiguous about the terms of the order and that the application for interpretation was inadmissible on those grounds alone. 蘑菇视频AT opined that, in actuality, the 蘑菇视频JSPB sought to appeal the judgment on the grounds that 蘑菇视频AT erred in making an award of interest, which 蘑菇视频JSPB believed was inconsistent with its Regulations. Noting that judgments of 蘑菇视频AT are final and without appeal, 蘑菇视频AT held that this attempt to...