Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2015-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-520

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT¡¯s legal conclusion that the application was timely was erroneous. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the application was not timely and not receivable ratione temporis. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT exceeded its competence or jurisdiction in receiving the application and addressing its merits. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT granted the appeal and vacated the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the decision not to place her on a roster. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT found for the Appellant and awarded her compensation and moral damages.

Legal Principle(s)

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT has no inherent power to suspend or waive the statutory time limits for filing an application.

Outcome

Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.