Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an interlocutory appeal by the Secretary-General. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT did not ¡°clearly exceed its competence or jurisdiction¡± when it temporarily suspended the administrative decision to laterally reassign the staff member as that decision did not constitute a case of ¡°appointment, promotion, or termination¡± excluded from interim relief under Article 10. 2 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute. Accordingly, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the interlocutory appeal as not receivable.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The staff member contested the decision to laterally reassign him and requested a suspension of action. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT issued an order granting the staff member¡¯s request for suspension of action pending resolution of the matter.
Legal Principle(s)
A lateral reassignment decision does not constitute a case of appointment, promotion, or termination. Therefore, it is subject to interim relief under Article 10. 2 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute.