Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ

2016-Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT-641

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements

Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an interlocutory appeal by the Secretary-General. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT did not ¡°clearly exceed its competence or jurisdiction¡± when it temporarily suspended the administrative decision to laterally reassign the staff member as that decision did not constitute a case of ¡°appointment, promotion, or termination¡± excluded from interim relief under Article 10. 2 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute. Accordingly, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT dismissed the interlocutory appeal as not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The staff member contested the decision to laterally reassign him and requested a suspension of action. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT issued an order granting the staff member¡¯s request for suspension of action pending resolution of the matter.

Legal Principle(s)

A lateral reassignment decision does not constitute a case of appointment, promotion, or termination. Therefore, it is subject to interim relief under Article 10. 2 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.