Search
2011-蘑菇视频AT-114, Bertucci
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Mr Bertucci. Recalling that compensation in the absence of actual injury is without legal basis, 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT erred in law. However, acceding in part to the cross-appeal by Mr Bertucci, 蘑菇视频AT held that when the disciplinary procedure does not bear out allegations against a staff member that may have been considered during a preliminary investigation, entitlements that may have been lawfully withheld pursuant to administrative instruction ST/AI/2004/3 must be paid in full, including interest. 蘑菇视频AT held that the award...
2011-蘑菇视频AT-111, Sprauten
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General limited to Case 2. 蘑菇视频AT held that it did not matter that the start date of the contract was not mentioned in the offer itself, as the emails showed that this date was clearly given as an essential condition for the offer and that it was only subject to minimal change. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT distorted the facts by failing to recognise that, in this case, the start date was an essential condition for the offer and that, by continuing to contest it, Mr Sprauten had never unconditionally accepted the offer made to him. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT committed...
蘑菇视频DT/2011/051, Mills-Aryee
i. Prima facie unlawfulness: The Tribunal found that prima facie unlawfulness had been established because the Applicant identified anomalies in the processes used by 蘑菇视频ON. ii. Particular urgency: The Tribunal noted that the selection decision had been communicated to the selected candidate by 蘑菇视频ON before the Applicant filed her application. As the contested decision had been implemented, the element of particular urgency had not been met. iii. Irreparable damage: The Tribunal found that the Applicant established irreparable damage in that there would be harm to her reputation and career...
2010-蘑菇视频AT-100, Abboud
蘑菇视频AT affirmed that the circumstances of the allegation of unsatisfactory conduct in the present case created the obligation to initiate a preliminary investigation. However, 蘑菇视频AT noted that 蘑菇视频DT erred in awarding damages to Mr Abboud while finding that he had not suffered any economic loss and that no actual damage existed. 蘑菇视频AT rescinded the 蘑菇视频DT’s judgment to the extent that it awarded damages to Mr Abboud.
2011-蘑菇视频AT-101, Mezoui
蘑菇视频AT had before it: an application for interpretation of judgment No. 2010-蘑菇视频AT-043 on the issue of to which 蘑菇视频DT Registry 蘑菇视频AT remanded Ms Mezoui’s case; two appeals from 蘑菇视频DT Order Nos. 71 (GVA/2010) and 73 (GVA/2010); and a motion for joinder and fast-track hearing. 蘑菇视频AT held that the application for interpretation was a ruse to have 蘑菇视频AT interfere with 蘑菇视频DT’s assignment of venue. 蘑菇视频AT held that venue was a matter for the trial court’s discretion, with which it would not interfere. 蘑菇视频AT held that it would not, generally, entertain interlocutory appeals. 蘑菇视频AT denied the application for...
2011-蘑菇视频AT-125, Beaudry
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal against judgment No. 蘑菇视频DT/2010/146 on compensation by the Secretary-General. 蘑菇视频AT held that once a judgment on the merits has been vacated and no liability on the part of the Administration has been established, a judgment on compensation cannot stand if it would be contrary to the final decision on the merits of the case. 蘑菇视频AT held that an appeal against the judgment on compensation was not necessary if the legal basis for the award of compensation by 蘑菇视频DT no longer existed. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal (as unnecessary) and vacated the 蘑菇视频DT judgment.
2011-蘑菇视频AT-123, Messinger
蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT correctly found that it did not have jurisdiction to conduct a de novo investigation of the Appellant’s formal complaint of harassment; rather its task was to determine if there was a proper investigation into the allegations. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT awarded adequate compensation to the Appellant for the infringement of his rights with regard to the harassment complaint. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT did not make any errors of procedure in deciding upon the weight to be given to written statements tendered by the Appellant. 蘑菇视频AT held that it was not persuaded that 蘑菇视频DT made any errors of...
2011-蘑菇视频AT-124, Appellant
蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant had failed to show how 蘑菇视频DT exceeded its jurisdiction or competence or failed to exercise its jurisdiction. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant had not identified an error on a question of law. 蘑菇视频AT held that it had no reason to disagree with 蘑菇视频DT’s holding that no institutional prejudice, or retaliation, played a part in the non-renewal of the Appellant’s contract. 蘑菇视频AT noted that the decision to take the Appellant’s portfolio away from him had been taken before he had made any report of wrongdoing. 蘑菇视频AT noted that the Appellant’s non-selection for the 11 posts involved...
2011-蘑菇视频AT-118, Abu-Hawaila
蘑菇视频AT was not persuaded that 蘑菇视频DT erred in its judgment. 蘑菇视频AT held that, at the time of receipt of his settlement offer, the time limit to file the application to 蘑菇视频DT had already run for approximately three weeks and nothing prevented the Appellant from filing his application or applying for a waiver or extension of the time limit. 蘑菇视频AT held that the exceptional suspension of time limits provided for under Article 8(1) of the 蘑菇视频DT Statute and provisional Staff Rule 11. 1 applied only to informal dispute resolution conducted through the Office of the Ombudsman. 蘑菇视频AT held that the settlement...
2011-蘑菇视频AT-119, Koumoin
蘑菇视频AT held that, except for the Appellant’s own assertion, it found no evidence to show that he was a genuine whistle-blower. 蘑菇视频AT held that it was not a case of retaliation following a report of possible misconduct, but instead a disagreement between the Appellant and management regarding work matters which was properly addressed in the context of the performance assessment process. 蘑菇视频AT held that the non-renewal of the Appellant’s contract was not retaliatory but based on his performance rating which had been reviewed and confirmed after a rebuttal opportunity was given to the Appellant. 蘑菇视频AT...
2011-蘑菇视频AT-120, Gabaldon
蘑菇视频AT recalled that an employment contract of a staff member subject to the internal laws of the Organisation is not the same as a contract between private parties and that the issuance of a letter of appointment by the Administration cannot be regarded as a mere formality. The issue before 蘑菇视频AT was whether the staff member, who had received an offer of employment, but not a letter of appointment, from the Organisation, should be regarded as a staff member and thus should have access to the internal justice system to contest the legality of the Administration’s withdrawal of the offer of...
2011-蘑菇视频AT-121, Bertucci
蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频DT judge had sufficient grounds to order the production of the documents withheld by the Administration concerning the selection process that led to the contested administrative decision. 蘑菇视频AT stated the principle that 蘑菇视频DT has the right to order the production of any document relevant for the purposes of the fair and expeditious disposal of its proceedings. If the Administration opposes 蘑菇视频DT’s order to produce a certain document in its possession, it may, with sufficiently specific and justified reasons, request 蘑菇视频DT to verify the confidentiality of the document in...
2011-蘑菇视频AT-122, Rolland
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal by Ms Rolland and a cross-appeal against the award of damages by the Secretary-General. 蘑菇视频AT held that the selection process conducted by an interview panel can be rescinded under rare circumstances. 蘑菇视频AT noted that, in general, when candidates have received fair consideration, discrimination and bias are absent, proper procedures have been followed, and all relevant material has been taken into consideration, the selection shall be upheld. 蘑菇视频AT held that Ms Rolland failed to discharge the burden of proof, by showing through clear and convincing evidence that she was...
2011-蘑菇视频AT-116, Iskandar
蘑菇视频AT held that, as a consequence of paragraph 11 of the Inter-Organisation Agreement, the 蘑菇视频, through 蘑菇视频AMID, undertook to extend the protection of its system of administration of justice to the Appellant in respect of administrative decisions taken by 蘑菇视频AMID during the term of the Loan Agreement. 蘑菇视频AT noted that under this provision, the Appellant could only appeal against the administrative decisions of WFP before ILOAT. 蘑菇视频AT held that, without access to the administration of justice system within the 蘑菇视频, the Appellant would have no right to an effective remedy from the competent tribunal in...
2011-蘑菇视频AT-117, Lutta
The Appellant appealed the amount of compensation awarded for loss of chance. 蘑菇视频AT noted that there was no set way for the trial court to set damages for loss of chance of promotion and that each case turned on its facts. 蘑菇视频AT noted that it would generally defer to the trial court’s discretion. 蘑菇视频AT did not accept the Appellant’s argument that the trial court was required to assess the percentage chances that he would have been selected: 蘑菇视频AT held that while it had approved that procedure as one method of assessing damages, it respected the opinion of the trial judge as to how to determine...
2011-蘑菇视频AT-115, Islam
蘑菇视频AT noted that the reason given for the non-renewal of the Appellant’s contract was a restructuring and that the Appellant conceded that the restructuring was properly done. 蘑菇视频AT agreed with 蘑菇视频DT that the opinion expressed by the Appellant’s Chief, that his performance deficiencies and shortcomings could justify the non-renewal of his contract, was immaterial. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Administration provided the Appellant with legitimate reasons for the non-renewal of his appointment. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频DT judgment.
2011-蘑菇视频AT-104, Sanwidi
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal of judgment No. 蘑菇视频DT/2010/061 on compensation. 蘑菇视频AT held that, as it had previously overturned the judgment on the merits (which found in favour of Mr Sanwidi), the foundation for an award of compensation no longer existed and the appeal was moot. 蘑菇视频AT held that the judgment on compensation was automatically vacated when it overturned the judgment on the merits. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and vacated the 蘑菇视频DT judgment.
2011-蘑菇视频AT-105, Fuentes
蘑菇视频AT considered appeals from both the Secretary-General and Ms Fuentes. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT correctly found her appeal regarding an investigation by OIOS to be time-barred. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT correctly held that it was the special procedure under Administrative Instruction ST/AI/1998/9 and not former Staff Rule 111(2)(a) that applied to appeals of classification decisions and that the Administration had failed to respond to Ms Fuentes’ appeal against the reclassification decision. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed both appeals and affirmed the 蘑菇视频DT judgment.
2011-蘑菇视频AT-106, Piskolti
蘑菇视频AT considered Mr Paskolti’s application for revision of former 蘑菇视频 Administrative Tribunal judgment No. 1459. 蘑菇视频AT held that Article 11 of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute and Article 24 of the 蘑菇视频AT Rules of Procedure did not confer jurisdiction on 蘑菇视频AT to review a judgment of the former 蘑菇视频 Administrative Tribunal. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the application for revision on the grounds of non-receivability.
2011-蘑菇视频AT-107, Chen
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Ms Chen. 蘑菇视频AT held that the principle that everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work (Article 23(2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) applies to 蘑菇视频 staff. 蘑菇视频AT held that budgetary considerations could not trump the requirement of equal treatment. 蘑菇视频AT declined to grant the relief sought by Ms Chen in her cross-appeal on the basis that 蘑菇视频DT awarded damages from the correct date. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Administration’s allegation that 蘑菇视频DT usurped the Secretary-General’s...