Search
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1032, Rolli
蘑菇视频AT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2019-蘑菇视频AT-952 by Mr Rolli. Mr Rolli contended that the remand order issued by 蘑菇视频AT, and in particular its reference to the need to have Mr Rolli’s appeal considered by a neural first instance body, coupled with the objective inability of the JAB to function as a neutral first instance process, constituted new facts that required 蘑菇视频AT to revise its judgment. 蘑菇视频AT held that neither the remand order of 蘑菇视频AT nor the need to have the Appellant’s appeal considered by a neutral first instance body, coupled with the objective inability of the...
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1021, Collins
蘑菇视频DT did not err in law or in fact when it found that the decision to abolish the post was lawful. However, in not providing reasons for its decision to commute the six-month notice period into compensation, the Organisation failed in its duty to demonstrate that its discretion was not exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, or unlawfully. The Administration failed to meet its burden to minimally demonstrate that the Appellant was given full and fair consideration. The Administration acted arbitrarily and thus failed to exercise its discretion lawfully. The termination of the Appellant’s...
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1013, Belsito
A telephone conversation that was suggestive of gender discrimination in the decision-making process and was raised by the Appellant in his application was ignored by 蘑菇视频DT. 蘑菇视频DT made an error in the procedure by failing to hold an oral hearing where witnesses could testify about that conversation. 蘑菇视频AT remanded the matter back to a different judge of the 蘑菇视频DT for the production of further evidence, additional findings of fact, and the issuance of a new judgment.
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1035, Gelsei
蘑菇视频AT held that exceptional circumstances existed which warranted an extension of time. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT’s discretion should have been exercised in the Appellant’s favour because it affected access to justice and there is a presumption that access to justice should not be denied at the outset without compelling reasons, which were absent. 蘑菇视频AT held that circumstances beyond the Appellant’s control prevented him from acting to file his appeal within the time limit and it would be unjust to visit upon the Appellant the consequences of an error (a fail in the electronic filing system) for which...
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1036, Mansour
蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT failed to address some issues before it, in respect of which the Appellant is entitled to a reasoned decision. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT erred in declining the Appellant’s implicit request for a hearing in person, at least without having considered it and given reasons. 蘑菇视频AT held that the termination of the Appellant’s appointment could not be assessed as hasty, premature, or arbitrary, with particular reference to the Medical Board process. 蘑菇视频AT held that any opportunity of the Appellant’s appointment to that vacancy had therefore passed, irrespective of her...
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1037, Yabowork
蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT’s language, which was strongly critical of the Appellant, was unwarranted. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT did not err in finding that the decision to discontinue the payment of her SPA was a legitimate exercise of the Administration’s discretion, as the Appellant no longer met the requirements for it. 蘑菇视频AT held that the discontinuation of the SPA was justified in view of the Administration’s obligation and right to correct such an erroneous situation. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频DT judgment.
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1018, Abu Ouda et al
蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT exercised its discretion lawfully to consolidate the cases. 蘑菇视频AT held that the impugned decisions were taken in good faith and on a reasonable basis. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was a bona fide reason to restructure and that it was operationally rational not to renew the Limited Duration Contracts at the time. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellants' argument with regard to their acquired rights being violated was without merit. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频DT judgment.
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1019, Houran et al
蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellants failed to specifically identify the errors allegedly committed by the 蘑菇视频RWA DT and therefore the appeals were defective for that reason but considered the appeals given that the appellants were not legally represented. 蘑菇视频AT held that any error on a finding of fact of when the Appellants receive notification of the administrative decision did not result in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 蘑菇视频AT held that whether the administrative decision was the expressed verbal communication of the denial to provide compensation or was implied from the refusal or failure to...
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1020, Dibs
蘑菇视频AT considered an application for execution of judgment No. 2017-蘑菇视频AT-798 by Mr. Dibs. 蘑菇视频AT granted in part the application for execution of judgment and ordered 蘑菇视频RWA to fully execute the judgment within 30 calendar days, advising that failure to comply with the deadline would result in a finding of manifest abuse of process, the award of costs, and potentially, a referral for accountability. 蘑菇视频AT considered that the request for moral and pecuniary damages did not fall within the scope of the application.
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1022, El Shanti
蘑菇视频AT considered two appeals (consolidated) by Mr ElShanti of judgment No. 蘑菇视频RWA/DT/2019/051 and judgment No. 蘑菇视频RWA/DT/2019/065 respectively. On the consolidation of the cases, 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT had broad discretion in managing its cases and that it would only intervene in clear cases of denial of due process of law affecting a party’s right to produce evidence. Accordingly, 蘑菇视频AT rejected Mr ElShanti’s arguments against consolidation. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was no merit to Mr ElShanti’s claims that the characterization of the impugned administrative decision was incorrect, noting that 蘑菇视频RWA...
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1015, Handy
蘑菇视频AT held that there was no express rescission of the impugned decision by the Administration. 蘑菇视频AT held that monthly renewals pending the outcome of the rebuttal of a performance evaluation did not resolve the complaint of the non-renewal of the fixed-term appointment. 蘑菇视频AT held that the monthly renewals did not rescind or supersede the impugned decision and the application could not be considered moot. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT erred in its decision, resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 蘑菇视频AT upheld the appeal, vacated the 蘑菇视频DT judgment, and remanded the matter to 蘑菇视频DT for proper...
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1024, Nyawa
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Mr. Nyawa. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Nyawa committed the disciplinary offenses attributed to him. 蘑菇视频AT held that the established facts amounted to misconduct on the part of Mr. Nyawa. 蘑菇视频AT disagreed with 蘑菇视频DT that a written censure was subsumed by the sanction of deferment for eligibility for promotion, however, 蘑菇视频AT found that 蘑菇视频DT’s holding that the deferment for eligibility for promotion was sufficient sanction was not a manifestly unreasonable decision warranting 蘑菇视频AT intervention...
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1025, Murad
蘑菇视频RWA DT did not err in its determinations or award of moral damages, which was a reasonable amount in the circumstances. 蘑菇视频RWA DT did not err in deciding not to order any material damages. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频RWA DT judgment.
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1029, El Madhoun
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT correctly concluded that 蘑菇视频RWA had failed to provide sufficiently clear, precise, and intelligible reasoning and had not acted lawfully, reasonably, and fairly. 蘑菇视频AT held that once a staff member was eligible for EVR in accordance with paragraph 8 of Area Staff Rule 109. 2, paragraph 9 became applicable and its text was clear. 蘑菇视频AT held that Mr. El Madhoun was eligible for EVR and it was not established that budgetary constraints were either ground for rejecting his request for EVR or for not withdrawing his notice...
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1012, Heftberger
蘑菇视频AT denied the request for an oral hearing, finding it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case. 蘑菇视频AT held, recalling the Spinardi jurisprudence (judgment No. 2019-蘑菇视频AT-957), that the decision on the Appellant’s complaints was not made utilizing a neutral first instance process as required jurisdictionally by Article 2. 10 of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. 蘑菇视频AT noted that the appealed decision was made by the ICAO Secretary-General whose own earlier decision(s) the Appellant had challenged. 蘑菇视频AT allowed the appeal and set aside the ICAO Secretary-General’s and/or the AJAB’s...
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1014, Chhikara
蘑菇视频AT held that the reason upon which 蘑菇视频DT decided not to rescind the contested decision, i. e. the lapse of time, was insufficient justification. 蘑菇视频AT held that, given the grossly negligent illegalities in which the selection process was conducted as found by 蘑菇视频DT, rescission of the contested decision was mandatory and could not be avoided on the basis of the excessive length of time between the filing of the application and the 蘑菇视频DT judgment. 蘑菇视频AT held that allowing the decision not to select the Appellant to remain in effect as if it was correct, despite its clear illegality, was not...
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1017, Salhi et al
As a preliminary matter, 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT exercised its discretion in consolidating the cases lawfully and appropriately. 蘑菇视频AT held the impugned decision was taken in good faith and on a reasonable basis. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was a bona fide reason to restructure and that it was operationally rational not to renew certain fixed-term appointments on a full-time basis but to reclassify them to part-time appointments. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellants’ claim that their acquired rights were violated was without merit. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频RWA DT judgment.
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1026, Diallo
蘑菇视频AT considered an application revision of judgment No. 2019-蘑菇视频AT-936 by Mr Diallo. 蘑菇视频AT held that Mr Diallo failed to establish the statutory conditions that had to be fulfilled before a judgment could be revised, namely there was no discovery of a decisive fact which was, at the time the judgment was rendered, unknown to 蘑菇视频AT and to him. 蘑菇视频AT held that an application for revision of a judgment that does not meet the statutory prerequisites cannot be a collateral means of attack on the judgment or allowed to be the second right of final appeal. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the application for revision.
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1028, El Najjar
Absent any evidence of any improper motive or irrational consideration, and given the bonafide and operational necessity to restructure, there was no basis to conclude that the 蘑菇视频RWA Commissioner-General acted unreasonably. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频RWA DT judgment.
2020-蘑菇视频AT-1016, Abu Ata et al
蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT exercised its discretion to consolidate the cases lawfully and appropriately. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was a bona fide reason to restructure and that it was operationally rational to abolish the posts and reclassify them from full-time to part-time posts at that time. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellants’ contention that their acquired rights were violated had no merit. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频RWA DT judgment.