蘑菇视频

Article 7.2

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 1 - 3 of 3
    2015-蘑菇视频AT-604, Ocokoru

    The issue for determination by 蘑菇视频AT was whether the relevant date for the filing of the Secretary-General’s appeal ran from the date on which the ALS received the 蘑菇视频DT judgment in its capacity as counsel of record for the Secretary-General before 蘑菇视频DT or the date on which the judgment was received by the OLA, the Secretary-General’s counsel of record before 蘑菇视频AT. 蘑菇视频AT held that in the absence of any published 蘑菇视频DT rule or practice direction which decreed that transmission of 蘑菇视频DT judgments be made to OLA, it was not permissible for the Secretary-General to seek to rely on the date when the...

    2020-蘑菇视频AT-1049, Kisia

    蘑菇视频AT held that exceptional circumstances existed on the basis that the Appellant was suffering from a medical condition, hospitalized and unable to file the appeal on a timely basis. 蘑菇视频AT waived the deadline for appeal and held the appeal to be receivable. 蘑菇视频AT held that, in his appeal, the Appellant largely repeated the submissions and allegations raised before 蘑菇视频DT, without identifying the specific errors of law or errors of fact that resulted in a manifestly unreasonable decision. On the Appellant’s claims relating to the use of and access to the closed-circuit television (CCTV) video...

    2021-蘑菇视频AT-1120, Jose Daniel Arango

    蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Secretary-General was correct to bide his time and to await the outcome on the merits before determining whether an appeal was necessary. 蘑菇视频AT held that the appeal of the Secretary-General was not time-barred. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT erred in concluding that Mr. Arango was a former staff member for the purposes of founding jurisdiction over the instant application: At the time of the contested decision not to select him Mr. Arango had been separated from service for more than two years, was no longer a staff member in the...