蘑菇视频

Article 7.3

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 1 - 1 of 1
    2025-蘑菇视频AT-1525, Abdurrahman Turk

    The 蘑菇视频AT found that the staff member had filed his appeal more than a year after the issuance of the 蘑菇视频DT Judgment and even if he had requested a waiver of the time limit on the basis of exceptional circumstances, his appeal was time-barred and not receivable ratione temporis.

    The 蘑菇视频AT nevertheless noted that the staff member’s application filed with the 蘑菇视频DT was not receivable under the doctrine of res judicata because the 蘑菇视频AT had already affirmed in its earlier judgment a 蘑菇视频DT judgment deciding his challenge to the same administrative decision.

    The 蘑菇视频AT found that the staff member sought to...